## Defining what `Rounding` is
This PR defines what `Rounding` means: it is the corner radius of
underlying `RectShape` rectangle. If you use `StrokeKind::Inside`, this
means the rounding is of the outer part of the stroke. Conversely, if
you use `StrokeKind::Outside`, the stroke is outside the rounded
rectangle, so the stroke has an inner radius or `rounding`, and an outer
radius that is larger by `stroke.width`.
This definitions is the same as Figma uses.
## Improving general shape rendering
The rendering of filled shapes (rectangles, circles, paths, bezier) has
been rewritten. Instead of first painting the fill with the stroke on
top, we now paint them as one single mesh with shared vertices at the
border. This has several benefits:
* Less work (faster and with fewer vertices produced)
* No overdraw (nicer rendering of translucent shapes)
* Correct blending of stroke and fill
The logic for rendering thin strokes has also been improved, so that the
width of a stroke of `StrokeKind::Outside` never affects the filled area
(this used to be wrong for thin strokes).
## Improving of rectangle rendering
Rectangles also has specific improvements in how thin rectangles are
painted.
The handling of "Blur width" is also a lot better, and now works for
rectangles with strokes.
There also used to be bugs with specific combinations of corner radius
and stroke width, that are now fixed.
## But why?
With the new `egui::Scene` we end up with a lot of zoomed out shapes,
with sub-pixel strokes. These need to look good! One thing led to
another, and then I became obsessive 😅
## Tessellation Test
In order to investigate the rendering, I created a Tessellation Test in
the `egui_demo_lib`.
[Try it
here](https://egui-pr-preview.github.io/pr/5669-emilkimprove-tessellator)
Adds `RectShape::stroke_kind` so you can select if the stroke goes
inside, outside, or is centered on the rectangle.
Also adds `RectShape::round_to_pixels` so you can override
`TessellationOptions::round_rects_to_pixels`.
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4776>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
I've been meaning to look into this for a while but finally bit the
bullet this week. Contrary to what I initially thought, the problem of
blurry lines is unrelated to feathering because it also happens with
feathering disabled.
The root cause is that lines tend to land on pixel boundaries, and
because of that, frequently used strokes (e.g. 1pt), end up partially
covering pixels. This is especially noticeable on 1ppp displays.
There were a couple of things to fix, namely: individual lines like
separators and indents but also shape strokes (e.g. Frame).
Lines were easy, I just made sure we round them to the nearest pixel
_center_, instead of the nearest pixel boundary.
Strokes were a little more complicated. To illustrate why, here’s an
example: if we're rendering a 5x5 rect (black fill, red stroke), we
would expect to see something like this:
The fill and the stroke to cover entire pixels. Instead, egui was
painting the stroke partially inside and partially outside, centered
around the shape’s path (blue line):
Both methods are valid for different use-cases but the first one is what
we’d typically want for UIs to feel crisp and pixel perfect. It's also
how CSS borders work (related to #4019 and #3284).
Luckily, we can use the normal computed for each `PathPoint` to adjust
the location of the stroke to be outside, inside, or in the middle.
These also are the 3 types of strokes available in tools like Photoshop.
This PR introduces an enum `StrokeKind` which determines if a
`PathStroke` should be tessellated outside, inside, or _on_ the path
itself. Where "outside" is defined by the directions normals point to.
Tessellator will now use `StrokeKind::Outside` for closed shapes like
rect, ellipse, etc. And `StrokeKind::Middle` for the rest since there's
no meaningful "outside" concept for open paths. This PR doesn't expose
`StrokeKind` to user-land, but we can implement that later so that users
can render shapes and decide where to place the stroke.
### Strokes test
(blue lines represent the size of the rect being rendered)
`Stroke::Middle` (current behavior, 1px and 3px are blurry)
`Stroke::Outside` (proposed default behavior for closed paths)
`Stroke::Inside` (for completeness but unused at the moment)
### Demo App
The best way to review this PR is to run the demo on a 1ppp display,
especially to test hover effects. Everything should look crisper. Also
run it in a higher dpi screen to test that nothing broke 🙏.
Before:
After (notice the sharper lines):
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
I removed (I hope so) all wildcard imports I found.
For me on my pc this improved the build time:
- for egui -5s
- for eframe -12s
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo cranky`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
I had to make a couple types not Copy because closures, but it should'nt
be a massive deal.
I tried my best to make the API change as non breaking as possible.
Anywhere a PathStroke is used, you can just use a normal Stroke instead.
As mentioned above, the bezier paths couldn't be copy anymore, but IMO
that's a minor caveat.
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
Emil Ernerfeldt
Juan Campa
Nicolas
Joe Sorensen