* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Splitting this out from the Parley work as requested. This removes
`FontImage` and makes the font atlas use a `ColorImage`. It converts
alpha to coverage at glyph-drawing time, not at delta-upload time.
This doesn't do much now, but will allow for color emoji rendering once
we start using Parley.
I've changed things around so that we pass in `text_alpha_to_coverage`
to the `Fonts` the same way we do with `pixels_per_point` and
`max_texture_side`, reusing the existing code to check if the setting
differs and recreating the font atlas if so. I'm not quite sure why this
wasn't done in the first place.
I've left `ImageData` as an enum for now, in case we want to add support
for more texture pixel formats in the future (which I personally think
would be worthwhile). If you'd like, I can just remove that enum
entirely.
This fixes bugs related to how an `Image` follows the size of an SVG.
We track the "source size" of each image, i.e. the original width/height
of the SVG, which can be different from whatever it was rasterized as.
Hey! I am not sure if this is something that's been considered before
and decided against (I couldn't find any PR's or issues).
This change removes the internal profiling macros in library crates and
the `puffin` feature and replaces it with similar functions in the
[profiling](https://github.com/aclysma/profiling) crate. This crate
provides a layer of abstraction over various profiler instrumentation
crates and allows library users to pick their favorite (supported)
profiler.
An additional benefit for puffin users is that dependencies of egui are
included in the instrumentation output too (mainly wgpu which uses the
profiling crate), so more details might be available when profiling.
A breaking change is that instead of using the `puffin` feature on egui,
users that want to profile the crate with puffin instead have to enable
the `profile-with-puffin` feature on the profiling crate. Similarly they
could instead choose to use `profile-with-tracy` etc.
I tried to add a 'tracy' feature to egui_demo_app in order to showcase ,
however the /scripts/check.sh currently breaks on mutually exclusive
features (which this introduces), so I decided against including it for
the initial PR. I'm happy to iterate more on this if there is interest
in taking this PR though.
Screenshot showing the additional info for wgpu now available when using
puffin

This implements web support for taking screenshots in an eframe app (and
adds a nice demo).
It also updates the native screenshot implementation to work with the
wgpu gl backend.
The wgpu implementation is quite different than the native one because
we can't block to wait for the screenshot result, so instead I use a
channel to pass the result to a future frame asynchronously.
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5425>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67cad40b-0384-431d-96a3-075cc3cb98fb
When mixing and matching eframe with other wgpu applications
(https://github.com/tracel-ai/burn in my case), it can be helpful to use
an existing wgpu setup to initialize eframe with. This PR changes the
WpuConfiguration (in a non-backwards compat way :/), to either take some
options how to create a wgpu setup, or an existing wgpu setup
(consisting of an instance, adapter, device and queue).
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Reich <r_andreas2@web.de>
* Closes#5224
I'm unfamiliar with wgpu, so I'd like someone to confirm, that calling
`wgpu::Texture` _after_ `wgpu::Queue::submit` is in fact the right thing
to do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Reich <r_andreas2@web.de>
A very common usability issue on egui-wgpu callbacks is that `paint`
can't access any data that doesn't strictly outlive the callback
resources' data. E.g. if the callback resources have an `Arc` to some
resource manager, you can't easily pull out resources since you
statically needed to ensure that those resource references outlived the
renderpass, whose lifetime was only constrained to the callback
resources themselves.
Wgpu 22 no longer has this restriction! Its (render/compute-)passes take
care of the lifetime of any passed resource internally. The lifetime
constraint is _still_ opt-out since it protects from a common runtime
error of adding commands/passes on the parent encoder while a previously
created pass wasn't closed yet.
This is not a concern in egui-wgpu since the paint method where we have
to access the render pass doesn't even have access to the encoder!
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
* Closes#5121
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
This unifies the code paths in `update_texture` somewhat, so that the
texture sampler and bind group are always replaced.
Not sure whether removing and reinserting the texture from and into the
`textures` map, or creating a new bind group, has much of a performance
impact. An alternative, as described in #5121, would be to split the
functionality for updating a texture's data from updating its options,
so that we don't have to unconditionally update the bind group (or do
something like store the options to check if they're changed).
Note this will break people depending on eframe or egui-wgpu with
--no-default-features.
I don't know what to do about that to be honest.
* Closes#4914
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Reich <r_andreas2@web.de>
As most of the code refers to types in epaint, it makes sense to use the
Color32 alias from epaint as well.
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
- [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
You can see this feature in action
[here](https://docs.rs/sysinfo/latest/src/sysinfo/common/system.rs.html#46)
or on any of dtolnay's crates and many others. I found myself going
through your project code recently on docs.rs and I was a bit sad I
couldn't have this feature enabled. This should fix it at next release.
:)
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
I removed (I hope so) all wildcard imports I found.
For me on my pc this improved the build time:
- for egui -5s
- for eframe -12s
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/1918
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4437
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4709
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Hiya,
I need new winit for a specific fix for a android_native_actvity. There
are already two PRs, but both don't seem to have a lot of movement, or
are entirely complete:
https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/4466
Seems to have gone stale & is missing some bits.
https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/4702
Also seems stale (if less so), and is missing a refactor to
run_on_demand. I also *think* the accesskit integration has a mistake
and can't be enabled. I've marked them as a co-author on this as I
started from this branch. (I think! Haven't done that on git before...).
Sorry for the wall of text but just dumping some details / thoughts
here:
- There's an issue with creating child windows in winit 0.30.1 and up on
macOS. The multiple_viewports, "create immediate viewport" example
crashes on anything later 0.30.1, with a stack overflow in unsafe code.
I've create [a winit
issue](https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/issues/3800), it *might*
already be fixed in 0.31.0 but I can't test as 0.31 will likely require
another refactoring. For now I have just pinned things to 0.30.0 exatly.
- Winit has deprecated run_on_demand, instead requiring the
ApplicationHandler interface. In 0.31.0 run_on_demand is removed. I've
refactored both the integration and the WinitApp trait to follow this
pattern. I've left user_events a bit more opaque, as it seems 0.31.0 is
doing a rework of UserEvents too.
- I've used the new lazy init approach for access kit from this branch
https://github.com/mwcampbell/egui/tree/accesskit-new-lazy-init and
marked Matt as co-author, thanks Matt!
- There was very similair but not quite the same code for run_and_return
and run_and_exit. I've merged them, but looking at the github issues
graveyard it seems vey finnicky. I *hope* this is more robust than
before but it's a bit scary.
- when receiving new_events this also used to check the redraw timing
dictionary. That doesn't seem necesarry so left this out, but that is a
slight behaviour change?
- I have reeneabled serial_windows on macOS. I wondered whether it was
fixed after this PR and does seem to be! However, even before this PR it
seems to work, so maybe winit has sorted things out before that...
Windows also works fine now without the extra hack.
- I've done a very basic test of AccessKit on Windows and screen reader
seems ok but I'm really not knowleadgable enough to say whether it's all
good or not.
- I've tested cargo tests & all examples on Windows & macOS, and ran a
basic Android app. Still, testing native platforms is wel... hard so if
anyone can test linux / iOs / older mac versions / windows 10 would
probably be a good idea!
- For consistencys sake I've made all event like functions in WinitApp
return a `Result<EventResult>`. There's quite a bit of Ok-wrapping now,
maybe too annoying? Not sure.
Thank you for having a look!
# Tested on
* [x] macOS
* [x] Windows
* [x] Wayland (thanks [SiebenCorgie](https://github.com/SiebenCorgie))
* [x] X11 (thanks
[crumblingstatue](https://github.com/crumblingstatue)!,
[SiebenCorgie](https://github.com/SiebenCorgie))
# TODO
* [x] Fix "follow system theme" not working on initial startup (winit
issue, pinning to 0.30.2 for now).
* [x] Fix `request_repaint_after`
---------
Co-authored-by: mwcampbell <mattcampbell@pobox.com>
Co-authored-by: j-axa <josef.axa@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: DataTriny <datatriny@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
0.20 has a bunch of bugs that will be fixed by:
* https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/5681
At Rerun, we don't want to wait for the wgpu 0.20.1 patch release before
we update egui, so we will temporarily downgrade to wgpu 0.19
After reverting I'll open a new PR that will update to 0.20 again, with
the intention of merging that once 0.20.1 is released.