This PR is a continuation of #4915 by @frederik-uni and @lucasmerlin
that introduces support for keeping egui content within the 'safe area'
on iOS (avoiding the notch / dynamic island / menu bar etc.), with the
following changes:
- `SafeArea` now wraps `MarginF32` and has been renamed to
`SafeAreaInsets` to clarify its purpose.
- `InputState::screen_rect` is now marked as deprecated in favour of
either `viewport_rect` (which contains the entire screen), or
`content_rect` (which is the viewport rect with the safe area insets
removed).
- I added some comments to the safe area insets logic pointing out the
[safe area API coming in winit
v0.31](https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/issues/3910).
---------
Co-authored-by: frederik-uni <147479464+frederik-uni@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Meurer <hi@lucasmerlin.me>
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
* follow up to #7514
That PR changed the tooltip to preserve the wrapping, which made the
tooltip kind of useless. With this PR the wrapping is reset for the
tooltip.
This adds a new mode, `UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force`, which will lower the
threshold to zero, overwriting every image that is not _exactly_ the
same.
Most comparisons has a threshold because different GPUs render slightly
differently. However, setting that threshold accurately can be hard.
Sometimes a test will pass locally, but fail on CI. In those cases you
want to force an update of the failing test. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
And sometimes a small change _should_ update all images, but the change
is so tiny that it falls under the threshold. Still, you want to make a
point of showing that these images have changes. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
This adds a custom Node struct with proper support for egui types
(`Key`, `Modifiers`, `egui::Event`, `Rect`) instead of needing to use
the kittest / accesskit types.
I also changed the `click` function to do a proper mouse move / mouse
down instead of the accesskit click. Also added `accesskit_click` to
trigger the accesskit event. This resulted in some changed snapshots,
since the elements are now hovered.
Also renamed `press_key` to `key_press` for consistency with
`key_down/key_up`.
Also removed the Deref to the AccessKit Node, to make it clearer when to
expect egui and when to expect accesskit types.
* Closes#5705
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Today each widget does its own custom layout, which has some drawbacks:
- not very flexible
- you can add an `Image` to `Button` but it will always be shown on the
left side
- you can't add a `Image` to a e.g. a `SelectableLabel`
- a lot of duplicated code
This PR introduces `Atoms` and `AtomLayout` which abstracts over "widget
content" and layout within widgets, so it'd be possible to add images /
text / custom rendering (for e.g. the checkbox) to any widget.
A simple custom button implementation is now as easy as this:
```rs
pub struct ALButton<'a> {
al: AtomicLayout<'a>,
}
impl<'a> ALButton<'a> {
pub fn new(content: impl IntoAtomics) -> Self {
Self { al: content.into_atomics() }
}
}
impl<'a> Widget for ALButton<'a> {
fn ui(mut self, ui: &mut Ui) -> Response {
let response = ui.ctx().read_response(ui.next_auto_id());
let visuals = response.map_or(&ui.style().visuals.widgets.inactive, |response| {
ui.style().interact(&response)
});
self.al.frame = self
.al
.frame
.inner_margin(ui.style().spacing.button_padding)
.fill(visuals.bg_fill)
.stroke(visuals.bg_stroke)
.corner_radius(visuals.corner_radius);
self.al.show(ui)
}
}
```
The initial implementation only does very basic layout, just enough to
be able to implement most current egui widgets, so:
- only horizontal layout
- everything is centered
- a single item may grow/shrink based on the available space
- everything can be contained in a Frame
There is a trait `IntoAtoms` that conveniently allows you to construct
`Atoms` from a tuple
```
ui.button((Image::new("image.png"), "Click me!"))
```
to get a button with image and text.
This PR reimplements three egui widgets based on the new AtomLayout:
- Button
- matches the old button pixel-by-pixel
- Button with image is now [properly
aligned](https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/5830/files#diff-962ce2c68ab50724b01c6b64c683c4067edd9b79fcdcb39a6071021e33ebe772)
in justified layouts
- selected button style now matches SelecatbleLabel look
- For some reason the DragValue text seems shifted by a pixel almost
everywhere, but I think it's more centered now, yay?
- Checkbox
- basically pixel-perfect but apparently the check mesh is very slightly
different so I had to update the snapshot
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
- RadioButton
- pixel-perfect
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
I plan on updating TextEdit based on AtomLayout in a separate PR (so
you could use it to add a icon within the textedit frame).
Breaking change!
* `Rounding` -> `CornerRadius`
* `rounding` -> `corner_radius`
This is to:
* Clarify
* Conform to other systems (e.g. Figma)
* Avoid confusion with `GuiRounding`
This is a breaking change, requiring users to think about wether the
stroke is inside/centered/outside the rect.
When in doubt, add `egui::StrokeKind::Inside` to the function call.
* Part of https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4019
`Frame` now includes the width of the stroke as part of its size. From
the new docs:
### `Frame` docs
The total (outer) size of a frame is `content_size + inner_margin +
2*stroke.width + outer_margin`.
Everything within the stroke is filled with the fill color (if any).
```text
+-----------------^-------------------------------------- -+
| | outer_margin |
| +------------v----^------------------------------+ |
| | | stroke width | |
| | +------------v---^---------------------+ | |
| | | | inner_margin | | |
| | | +-----------v----------------+ | | |
| | | | ^ | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |<------ content_size ------>| | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | v | | | |
| | | +------- content_rect -------+ | | |
| | | | | |
| | +-------------fill_rect ---------------+ | |
| | | |
| +----------------- widget_rect ------------------+ |
| |
+---------------------- outer_rect ------------------------+
```
The four rectangles, from inside to outside, are:
* `content_rect`: the rectangle that is made available to the inner
[`Ui`] or widget.
* `fill_rect`: the rectangle that is filled with the fill color (inside
the stroke, if any).
* `widget_rect`: is the interactive part of the widget (what sense
clicks etc).
* `outer_rect`: what is allocated in the outer [`Ui`], and is what is
returned by [`Response::rect`].
### Notes
This required rewriting a lot of the layout code for `egui::Window`,
which was a massive pain. But now the window margin and stroke width is
properly accounted for everywhere.
Adds `Marginf` to fill the previous niche.
This is all in a pursuit to shrink the sizes of often-used structs, to
improve performance (less cache misses, less memcpy:s, etc).
* On the path towards https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4019
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
* [X] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
I am preparing a separate PR that adds support for JXL with `jxl-oxide`,
which is unlikely to be added to the `image` crate anytime soon (more
context will be provided in that PR).
`jxl-oxide` makes use of the
[`array::each_mut`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.array.html#method.each_mut)
API which was stabilized in 1.77, which is the motivation for this MSRV
bump.
Rust 1.77 was officially released to stable on 21 March, 2024.
Affects `.on_hover_text(…)` with dynamic content (i.e. content that
changes over time).
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5167
`.on_hover_ui` with dynamic content can still hit the shrinking problem.
The general solution depends on solving
https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5138 but a work-around is to add
this to your tooltips:
```diff
response.on_hover_ui(|ui| {
+ ui.set_max_width(ui.spacing().tooltip_width);
// …
});
```
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4976
* Part of #4378
* Implements parts of #843
### Background
Some widgets (like `Grid` and `Table`) needs to know the width of future
elements in order to properly size themselves. For instance, the width
of the first column of a grid may not be known until all rows of the
grid has been added, at which point it is too late. Therefore these
widgets store sizes from the previous frame. This leads to "first-frame
jitter", were the content is placed in the wrong place for one frame,
before being accurately laid out in subsequent frames.
### What
This PR adds the function `ctx.request_discard` which discards the
visual output and does another _pass_, i.e. calls the whole app UI code
once again (in eframe this means calling `App::update` again). This will
thus discard the shapes produced by the wrongly placed widgets, and
replace it with new shapes. Note that only the visual output is
discarded - all other output events are accumulated.
Calling `ctx.request_discard` should only be done in very rare
circumstances, e.g. when a `Grid` is first shown. Calling it every frame
will mean the UI code will become unnecessarily slow.
Two safe-guards are in place:
* `Options::max_passes` is by default 2, meaning egui will never do more
than 2 passes even if `request_discard` is called on every pass
* If multiple passes is done for multiple frames in a row, a warning
will be printed on the screen in debug builds:
### Breaking changes
A bunch of things that had "frame" in the name now has "pass" in them
instead:
* Functions called `begin_frame` and `end_frame` are now called
`begin_pass` and `end_pass`
* `FrameState` is now `PassState`
* etc
### TODO
* [x] Figure out good names for everything (`ctx.request_discard`)
* [x] Add API to query if we're gonna repeat this frame (to early-out
from expensive rendering)
* [x] Clear up naming confusion (pass vs frame) e.g. for `FrameState`
* [x] Figure out when to call this
* [x] Show warning on screen when there are several frames in a row with
multiple passes
* [x] Document
* [x] Default on or off?
* [x] Change `Context::frame_nr` name/docs
* [x] Rename `Context::begin_frame/end_frame` and deprecate the old ones
* [x] Test with Rerun
* [x] Document breaking changes
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4490>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---
Unfortunately, this PR contains a bunch of breaking changes because
`Context` no longer has one style, but two. I could try to add some of
the methods back if that's desired.
The most subtle change is probably that `style_mut` mutates both the
dark and the light style (which from the usage in egui itself felt like
the right choice but might be surprising to users).
I decided to deviate a bit from the data structure suggested in the
linked issue.
Instead of this:
```rust
pub theme: Theme, // Dark or Light
pub follow_system_theme: bool, // Change [`Self::theme`] based on `RawInput::system_theme`?
```
I decided to add a `ThemePreference` enum and track the current system
theme separately.
This has a couple of benefits:
* The user's theme choice is not magically overwritten on the next
frame.
* A widget for changing the theme preference only needs to know the
`ThemePreference` and not two values.
* Persisting the `theme_preference` is fine (as opposed to persisting
the `theme` field which may actually be the system theme).
The `small_toggle_button` currently only toggles between dark and light
(so you can never get back to following the system). I think it's easy
to improve on this in a follow-up PR :)
I made the function `pub(crate)` for now because it should eventually be
a method on `ThemePreference`, not `Theme`.
To showcase the new capabilities I added a new example that uses
different "accent" colors in dark and light mode:
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0bf728c6-2720-47b0-a908-18bd250d15a6"
width="250" alt="A screenshot of egui's widget gallery demo in dark mode
using a purple accent color instead of the default blue accent">
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e816b380-3e59-4f11-b841-8c20285988d6"
width="250" alt="A screenshot of egui's widget gallery demo in light
mode using a green accent color instead of the default blue accent">
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
This make the test excercise the window recreation logic, that resulted
in several bugs - see #4862
Adds a check box that turns the close button on and off for child
windows
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
All the other crates in egui have serde as an optional dependency -
which is great! But sadly egui_extras unconditionally includes it, which
adds a bunch of code to stuff that may not care for it. This PR gates
serde support behind a new `serde` feature.
This is a breaking change; if that's undesirable then we can add it as a
default feature instead, though that wouldn't match any of the other
crates.
You can now set custom tags on the `UiStack`. This allows you to write
code that is situationally aware at runtime. For instance, you could
decide wether or not a label should truncate its text depending on what
part of your ui it is in, without having to pass that info down via the
callstack.
* Closes#4534
This PR:
- Introduces `Ui::stack()`, which returns the `UiStack` structure
providing information on the current `Ui` hierarchy.
- **BREAKING**: `Ui::new()` now takes a `UiStackInfo` argument, which is
used to populate some of this `Ui`'s `UiStack`'s fields.
- **BREAKING**: `Ui::child_ui()` and `Ui::child_ui_with_id_source()` now
take an `Option<UiStackInfo>` argument, which is used to populate some
of the children `Ui`'s `UiStack`'s fields.
- New `Area::kind()` builder function, to set the `UiStackKind` value of
the `Area`'s `Ui`.
- Adds a (minimalistic) demo to egui demo (in the "Misc Demos" window).
- Adds a more thorough `test_ui_stack` test/playground demo.
TODO:
- [x] benchmarks
- [x] add example to demo
Future work:
- Add `UiStackKind` and related support for more container (e.g.
`CollapsingHeader`, etc.)
- Add a tag/property system that would allow adding arbitrary data to a
stack node. This data could then be queried by nested `Ui`s. Probably
needed for #3284.
- Add support to track columnar layouts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/1010
### In short
You can now put interactive widgets, like buttons and hyperlinks, in an
tooltip using `on_hover_ui`. If you do, the tooltip will stay open as
long as the user hovers it.
There is a new demo for this in the egui demo app (egui.rs):
### Design
Tooltips can now contain interactive widgets, such as buttons and links.
If they do, they will stay open when the user moves their pointer over
them.
Widgets that do not contain interactive widgets disappear as soon as you
no longer hover the underlying widget, just like before. This is so that
they won't annoy the user.
To ensure not all tooltips with text in them are considered interactive,
`selectable_labels` is `false` for tooltips contents by default. If you
want selectable text in tooltips, either change the `selectable_labels`
setting, or use `Label::selectable`.
```rs
ui.label("Hover me").on_hover_ui(|ui| {
ui.style_mut().interaction.selectable_labels = true;
ui.label("This text can be selected.");
ui.add(egui::Label::new("This too.").selectable(true));
});
```
### Changes
* Layers in `Order::Tooltip` can now be interacted with
* Part of https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4535
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/3974
This adds a special `sizing_pass` mode to `Ui`, in which we have no
centered or justified layouts, and everything is hidden. This is used by
`Area` to use the first frame to measure the size of its contents so
that it can then set the perfectly correct size the subsequent frames.
For menus, where buttons are justified (span the full width), this
finally the problem of auto-sizing. Before you would have to pick a
width manually, and all buttons would expand to that width. If it was
too wide, it looked weird. If it was too narrow, text would wrap. Now
all menus are exactly the width they need to be. By default menus will
wrap at `Spacing::menu_width`.
This affects all situations when you have something that should be as
small as possible, but still span the full width/height of the parent.
For instance: the `egui::Separator` widget now checks the
`ui.is_sizing_pass` flag before deciding on a size. In the sizing pass a
horizontal separator is always 0 wide, and only in subsequent passes
will it span the full width.
Emil Ernerfeldt
Ian Hobson
Andreas Reich
Lucas Meurer
valadaptive
TÖRÖK Attila
Lucas Meurer
Cody Neiman
Tau Gärtli
Nicolas
rustbasic
pm100
Nathan Adams
Antoine Beyeler