This adds a custom Node struct with proper support for egui types
(`Key`, `Modifiers`, `egui::Event`, `Rect`) instead of needing to use
the kittest / accesskit types.
I also changed the `click` function to do a proper mouse move / mouse
down instead of the accesskit click. Also added `accesskit_click` to
trigger the accesskit event. This resulted in some changed snapshots,
since the elements are now hovered.
Also renamed `press_key` to `key_press` for consistency with
`key_down/key_up`.
Also removed the Deref to the AccessKit Node, to make it clearer when to
expect egui and when to expect accesskit types.
* Closes#5705
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Today each widget does its own custom layout, which has some drawbacks:
- not very flexible
- you can add an `Image` to `Button` but it will always be shown on the
left side
- you can't add a `Image` to a e.g. a `SelectableLabel`
- a lot of duplicated code
This PR introduces `Atoms` and `AtomLayout` which abstracts over "widget
content" and layout within widgets, so it'd be possible to add images /
text / custom rendering (for e.g. the checkbox) to any widget.
A simple custom button implementation is now as easy as this:
```rs
pub struct ALButton<'a> {
al: AtomicLayout<'a>,
}
impl<'a> ALButton<'a> {
pub fn new(content: impl IntoAtomics) -> Self {
Self { al: content.into_atomics() }
}
}
impl<'a> Widget for ALButton<'a> {
fn ui(mut self, ui: &mut Ui) -> Response {
let response = ui.ctx().read_response(ui.next_auto_id());
let visuals = response.map_or(&ui.style().visuals.widgets.inactive, |response| {
ui.style().interact(&response)
});
self.al.frame = self
.al
.frame
.inner_margin(ui.style().spacing.button_padding)
.fill(visuals.bg_fill)
.stroke(visuals.bg_stroke)
.corner_radius(visuals.corner_radius);
self.al.show(ui)
}
}
```
The initial implementation only does very basic layout, just enough to
be able to implement most current egui widgets, so:
- only horizontal layout
- everything is centered
- a single item may grow/shrink based on the available space
- everything can be contained in a Frame
There is a trait `IntoAtoms` that conveniently allows you to construct
`Atoms` from a tuple
```
ui.button((Image::new("image.png"), "Click me!"))
```
to get a button with image and text.
This PR reimplements three egui widgets based on the new AtomLayout:
- Button
- matches the old button pixel-by-pixel
- Button with image is now [properly
aligned](https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/5830/files#diff-962ce2c68ab50724b01c6b64c683c4067edd9b79fcdcb39a6071021e33ebe772)
in justified layouts
- selected button style now matches SelecatbleLabel look
- For some reason the DragValue text seems shifted by a pixel almost
everywhere, but I think it's more centered now, yay?
- Checkbox
- basically pixel-perfect but apparently the check mesh is very slightly
different so I had to update the snapshot
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
- RadioButton
- pixel-perfect
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
I plan on updating TextEdit based on AtomLayout in a separate PR (so
you could use it to add a icon within the textedit frame).
This fixes bugs related to how an `Image` follows the size of an SVG.
We track the "source size" of each image, i.e. the original width/height
of the SVG, which can be different from whatever it was rasterized as.
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/3501
The problem occurs when you want to render the same SVG at different
scales, either at the same time in different parts of your UI, or at two
different times (e.g. the DPI changes).
The solution is to use the `SizeHint` as part of the key.
However, when you have an SVG in a resizable container, that can lead to
hundreds of versions of the same SVG. So new eviction code is added to
handle this case.
* Closes no issue, I just needed this for an app and figured it could be
useful.
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
This PR adds an `overline` option for `egui_extras::TableRow`, which is
useful for visually grouping rows. The overline consumes no layout
space.
A screenshot of the demo app, showing every 7th row getting an overline.
<img width="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-25 at 14 40 08"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9ccbee3d-296d-4afd-9290-c669e4ede1c0"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
This change allows `layouter` to use the `TextBuffer` instead of `&str`
in the closure. It is necessary when layout decisions depend on more
than just the raw string content, such as metadata stored in the
concrete type implementing `TextBuffer`.
In [our use case](https://github.com/damus-io/notedeck/pull/723), we
needed this to support mention highlighting when a user selects a
mention. Since mentions can contain spaces, determining mention
boundaries from the `&str` alone is impossible. Instead, we use the
`TextBuffer` implementation to retrieve the correct bounds.
See the video below for a demonstration:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cba2906-5546-4b52-b728-1da9c56a83e1
# Breaking change
This PR introduces a breaking change to the `layouter` function in
`TextEdit`.
Previous API:
```rust
pub fn layouter(mut self, layouter: &'t mut dyn FnMut(&Ui, &str, f32) -> Arc<Galley>) -> Self
```
New API:
```rust
pub fn layouter(mut self, layouter: &'t mut dyn FnMut(&Ui, &dyn TextBuffer, f32) -> Arc<Galley>) -> Self
```
## Impact on Existing Code
• Any existing usage of `layouter` will **no longer compile**.
• Callers must update their closures to use `&dyn TextBuffer` instead of
`&str`.
## Migration Guide
Before:
```rust
let mut layouter = |ui: &Ui, text: &str, wrap_width: f32| {
let layout_job = my_highlighter(text);
layout_job.wrap.max_width = wrap_width;
ui.fonts(|f| f.layout_job(layout_job))
};
```
After:
```rust
let mut layouter = |ui: &Ui, text: &dyn TextBuffer, wrap_width: f32| {
let layout_job = my_highlighter(text.as_str());
layout_job.wrap.max_width = wrap_width;
ui.fonts(|f| f.layout_job(layout_job))
};
```
---
* There is not an issue for this change.
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Signed-off-by: kernelkind <kernelkind@gmail.com>
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
This is not supported on the web and not yet on Wayland.
~~I also had to update `ring` and add an exception for `paste` being
unmaintained.~~ Has since been updated on master.
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Continuation of #5713
**Silently breaking changes:**
- Menus now close on click by default, this is configurable via
`PopupCloseBehavior`
**Additional additions:**
- `Button::right_text`
- `StyleModifier`
This is a rewrite of the egui menus, with the following goals:
- submenu buttons should work everywhere, in a popup, context menu,
area, in some random Ui
- remove the menu state from Ui
- should work just like the previous menu
- ~proper support for keyboard navigation~
- It's better now but requires further work to be perfect
- support `PopupCloseBehavior`
* Closes#4607
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
This adds a generic way of telling containers to close from their child
`Ui`s.
* Part of #5727
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
This introduces new `Tooltip` and `Popup` structs that unify and extend
the old popups and tooltips.
`Popup` handles the positioning and optionally stores state on whether
the popup is open (for click based popups like `ComboBox`, menus,
context menus).
`Tooltip` is based on `Popup` and handles state of whether the tooltip
should be shown (which turns out to be quite complex to handles all the
edge cases).
Both `Popup` and `Tooltip` can easily be constructed from a `Response`
and then customized via builder methods.
This also introduces `PositionAlign`, for aligning something outside of
a `Rect` (in contrast to `Align2` for aligning inside a `Rect`). But I
don't like the name, any suggestions? Inspired by [mui's tooltip
positioning](https://mui.com/material-ui/react-tooltip/#positioned-tooltips).
* Part of #4607
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
TODOs:
- [x] Automatic tooltip positioning based on available space
- [x] Review / fix / remove all code TODOs
- [x] ~Update the helper fns on `Response` to be consistent in naming
and parameters (Some use tooltip, some hover_ui, some take &self, some
take self)~ actually, I think the naming and parameter make sense on
second thought
- [x] Make sure all old code is marked deprecated
For discussion during review:
- the following check in `show_tooltip_for` still necessary?:
```rust
let is_touch_screen = ctx.input(|i| i.any_touches());
let allow_placing_below = !is_touch_screen; // There is a finger below. TODO: Needed?
```
I got annoyed by all the slightly different variations of "collect
snapshot results and unwrap them at the end of test" I've written, so I
added a struct to make this nice and simple.
One controversial thing: It panics when dropped. I wanted to ensure
people cannot forget to unwrap the results at the end, and this was the
best thing I could come up with. I don't think this is possible via
clippy lint or something like that.
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Breaking change!
* `Rounding` -> `CornerRadius`
* `rounding` -> `corner_radius`
This is to:
* Clarify
* Conform to other systems (e.g. Figma)
* Avoid confusion with `GuiRounding`
## Defining what `Rounding` is
This PR defines what `Rounding` means: it is the corner radius of
underlying `RectShape` rectangle. If you use `StrokeKind::Inside`, this
means the rounding is of the outer part of the stroke. Conversely, if
you use `StrokeKind::Outside`, the stroke is outside the rounded
rectangle, so the stroke has an inner radius or `rounding`, and an outer
radius that is larger by `stroke.width`.
This definitions is the same as Figma uses.
## Improving general shape rendering
The rendering of filled shapes (rectangles, circles, paths, bezier) has
been rewritten. Instead of first painting the fill with the stroke on
top, we now paint them as one single mesh with shared vertices at the
border. This has several benefits:
* Less work (faster and with fewer vertices produced)
* No overdraw (nicer rendering of translucent shapes)
* Correct blending of stroke and fill
The logic for rendering thin strokes has also been improved, so that the
width of a stroke of `StrokeKind::Outside` never affects the filled area
(this used to be wrong for thin strokes).
## Improving of rectangle rendering
Rectangles also has specific improvements in how thin rectangles are
painted.
The handling of "Blur width" is also a lot better, and now works for
rectangles with strokes.
There also used to be bugs with specific combinations of corner radius
and stroke width, that are now fixed.
## But why?
With the new `egui::Scene` we end up with a lot of zoomed out shapes,
with sub-pixel strokes. These need to look good! One thing led to
another, and then I became obsessive 😅
## Tessellation Test
In order to investigate the rendering, I created a Tessellation Test in
the `egui_demo_lib`.
[Try it
here](https://egui-pr-preview.github.io/pr/5669-emilkimprove-tessellator)
This is a breaking change, requiring users to think about wether the
stroke is inside/centered/outside the rect.
When in doubt, add `egui::StrokeKind::Inside` to the function call.
This is similar to `ScrollArea`, but:
* Supports zooming
* Has no scroll bars
* Has no limits on the scrolling
## TODO
* [x] Automatic sizing of `Scene`s outer bounds
* [x] Fix text selection in scenes
* [x] Implement `fit_rect`
* [x] Document / improve API
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
Previously, `Harness::run` just called `Harness::step` 3 times. If that
wasn't enough, tests would often call run multiple times so all
animations would finish properly.
Also, I introduced `HarnessBuilder::with_step_dt` to customize with how
big of a dt each frame is called. I set the default to 1.0 / 6.0 (~6fps)
so we don't waste cpu in tests waiting on animations.
`HarnessBuilder::max_steps` allows us to control how many steps
`Harness::run` should run before panicing.
The default is 6, so we run for up to 1.0 logical seconds (six frames at
6 fps), which should be enough to finish most animations.
Turns out a lot of snapshots where rendered before fully shown and had a
light opacity, those are now fixed.
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
* Part of https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4019
`Frame` now includes the width of the stroke as part of its size. From
the new docs:
### `Frame` docs
The total (outer) size of a frame is `content_size + inner_margin +
2*stroke.width + outer_margin`.
Everything within the stroke is filled with the fill color (if any).
```text
+-----------------^-------------------------------------- -+
| | outer_margin |
| +------------v----^------------------------------+ |
| | | stroke width | |
| | +------------v---^---------------------+ | |
| | | | inner_margin | | |
| | | +-----------v----------------+ | | |
| | | | ^ | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |<------ content_size ------>| | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | v | | | |
| | | +------- content_rect -------+ | | |
| | | | | |
| | +-------------fill_rect ---------------+ | |
| | | |
| +----------------- widget_rect ------------------+ |
| |
+---------------------- outer_rect ------------------------+
```
The four rectangles, from inside to outside, are:
* `content_rect`: the rectangle that is made available to the inner
[`Ui`] or widget.
* `fill_rect`: the rectangle that is filled with the fill color (inside
the stroke, if any).
* `widget_rect`: is the interactive part of the widget (what sense
clicks etc).
* `outer_rect`: what is allocated in the outer [`Ui`], and is what is
returned by [`Response::rect`].
### Notes
This required rewriting a lot of the layout code for `egui::Window`,
which was a massive pain. But now the window margin and stroke width is
properly accounted for everywhere.
Adds `Marginf` to fill the previous niche.
This is all in a pursuit to shrink the sizes of often-used structs, to
improve performance (less cache misses, less memcpy:s, etc).
* On the path towards https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4019
* Part of https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/4019
As part of the work on adding a custom `Border` to everything, I want to
make sure that the size of `RectShape`, `Frame` and the future `Border`
is kept small (for performance reasons).
This PR changes the storage of the corner radius of rectangles from four
`f32` (one for each corner) into four `u8`. This mean the corner radius
can only be an integer in the range 0-255 (in ui points). This should be
enough for most people.
If you want to manipulate rounding using `f32`, there is a new
`Roundingf` to fill that niche.
This implements web support for taking screenshots in an eframe app (and
adds a nice demo).
It also updates the native screenshot implementation to work with the
wgpu gl backend.
The wgpu implementation is quite different than the native one because
we can't block to wait for the screenshot result, so instead I use a
channel to pass the result to a future frame asynchronously.
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5425>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67cad40b-0384-431d-96a3-075cc3cb98fb
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5423
New output is actionable
```
failures:
---- demo::demo_app_windows::tests::demos_should_match_snapshot stdout ----
thread 'demo::demo_app_windows::tests::demos_should_match_snapshot' panicked at crates/egui_demo_lib/src/demo/demo_app_windows.rs:433:9:
Errors: [
"'demos/Code Example' Image size did not match snapshot. Expected: (402, 574), Actual: (415, 574).
Run `UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=1 cargo test` to update the snapshots.",
]
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
demo::demo_app_windows::tests::demos_should_match_snapshot
```
* Closes#686
* Closes#839
* #5370 should be merged before this
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
This adds modals to egui.
This PR
- adds a new `Modal` struct
- adds `Memory::set_modal_layer` to limit focus to a layer and above
(used by the modal struct, but could also be used by custom modal
implementations)
- adds `Memory::allows_interaction` to check if a layer is behind a
modal layer, deprecating `Layer::allows_interaction`
Current problems:
- ~When a button is focused before the modal opens, it stays focused and
you also can't hit tab to focus the next widget. Seems like focus is
"stuck" on that widget until you hit escape. This might be related to
https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5359~ fixed!
Possible future improvements:
- The titlebar from `window` should be made into a separate widget and
added to the modal
- The state whether the modal is open should be stored in egui
(optionally), similar to popup and menu. Ideally before this we would
refactor popup state to unify popup and menu
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
The allows us to pass any state to the ui closure. While it is possible
to just store state in the closure itself, accessing that state after
the harness was created to e.g. read or modify it would require interior
mutability. With this change there are new `Harness::new_state`,
`Harness::run_state`, ... methods that allow passing state on each run.
This builds on top of #5301, which should be merged first
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
This adds a `Harness::new_ui`, which accepts a Ui closure and shows the
ui in a central panel. One big benefit is that this allows us to add a
fit_contents method that can run the ui closure with a sizing pass and
resize the "screen" based on the content size.
I also used this to add a snapshot test for the rendering_test at
different scales.
This adds `egui_kittest::try_image_snapshot_options` and
`egui_kittest::image_snapshot_options`, as well as
`Harness::wgpu_snapshot_options` and
`Harness::try_wgpu_snapshot_options`
* [X] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
- closes#3491
- closes#3926
This adds a testing library to egui based on
[kittest](https://github.com/rerun-io/kittest). Kittest is a new
[AccessKit](https://github.com/AccessKit/accesskit/)-based testing
library. The api is inspired by the js
[testing-library](https://testing-library.com/) where the idea is also
to query the dom based on accessibility attributes.
We made kittest with egui in mind but it should work with any rust gui
framework with AccessKit support.
It currently has support for:
- running the egui app, frame by frame
- building the AccessKit tree
- ergonomic queries via kittest
- via e.g. get_by_name, get_by_role
- simulating events based on the accesskit node id
- creating arbitrary events based on Harness::input_mut
- rendering screenshots via wgpu
- snapshot tests with these screenshots
A simple test looks like this:
```rust
fn main() {
let mut checked = false;
let app = |ctx: &Context| {
CentralPanel::default().show(ctx, |ui| {
ui.checkbox(&mut checked, "Check me!");
});
};
let mut harness = Harness::builder().with_size(egui::Vec2::new(200.0, 100.0)).build(app);
let checkbox = harness.get_by_name("Check me!");
assert_eq!(checkbox.toggled(), Some(Toggled::False));
checkbox.click();
harness.run();
let checkbox = harness.get_by_name("Check me!");
assert_eq!(checkbox.toggled(), Some(Toggled::True));
// You can even render the ui and do image snapshot tests
#[cfg(all(feature = "wgpu", feature = "snapshot"))]
egui_kittest::image_snapshot(&egui_kittest::wgpu::TestRenderer::new().render(&harness), "readme_example");
}
```
~Since getting wgpu to run in ci is a hassle, I'm taking another shot at
creating a software renderer for egui (ideally without a huge dependency
like skia)~ (this didn't work as well as I hoped and it turns out in CI
you can just run tests on a mac runner which comes with a real GPU)
Here is a example of a failed snapshot test in ci, it will say which
snapshot failed and upload an artifact with the before / after and diff
images:
https://github.com/emilk/egui/actions/runs/11183049487/job/31090724606?pr=5166
Lucas Meurer
Patrick Marks
Nicolas
Emil Ernerfeldt
Sven Niederberger
Aarni Koskela
kernelkind
Lucas Meurer
Jochen Görtler