* closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5674
This changes egui to create an AccessKit node for each `Ui`. I'm not
sure if this alone will directly improve accessibility, but it should
make it easier to create the correct parent / child relations (e.g.
grouping menus as children of menu buttons).
Instead of having a global stack of parent ids, they are now passed via
a parent_id field in `UiBuilder`.
If having all these `GenericContainer` nodes somehow is bad for
accessibility, the PR could also be changed to only create nodes if
there is actually some accessibility info with it (the relevant is
currently commented-out in the PR). But I think screen readers should
just ignore these nodes, so it should be fine? We could also use this as
motivation to git red of some unnecessary wrapped `Ui`s, e.g.
CentralPanel creates 3 Uis when 2 should be enough (the initial Ui and a
Frame, maybe we could even only show the `Frame` if we can give it an
UiBuilder and somehow show the Frame with `Ui::new`).
Here is a screenshot from the accessibility inspector
(https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/7368) with this PR:
<img width="431" height="744" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-24 at 12 09 55"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c4e5ff6-5c38-450e-9500-0776c9018d8c"
/>
Without this PR:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/270e32fc-9c7a-4dad-8c90-7638c487a602
Adds a helper to quickly see whats going on in a kittest test.
Not all test have snapshots, but when debugging tests it might still be
useful to see whats actually going on, so this adds a helper fn that
renders a snapshot image to a temporary file and opens it with the
default image viewer:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/08785850-0a12-4572-b9b5-cea36951081c
This PR is a continuation of #4915 by @frederik-uni and @lucasmerlin
that introduces support for keeping egui content within the 'safe area'
on iOS (avoiding the notch / dynamic island / menu bar etc.), with the
following changes:
- `SafeArea` now wraps `MarginF32` and has been renamed to
`SafeAreaInsets` to clarify its purpose.
- `InputState::screen_rect` is now marked as deprecated in favour of
either `viewport_rect` (which contains the entire screen), or
`content_rect` (which is the viewport rect with the safe area insets
removed).
- I added some comments to the safe area insets logic pointing out the
[safe area API coming in winit
v0.31](https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/issues/3910).
---------
Co-authored-by: frederik-uni <147479464+frederik-uni@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Meurer <hi@lucasmerlin.me>
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
* Closes https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/issues/11301
This fixes a bug where a menu could get stuck, not closing at all, when
the currently open submenu stops being shown.
I also added a way to reproduce this to the demo, as well as a test
ensuring that there is no race condition in the fix.
This adds a new mode, `UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force`, which will lower the
threshold to zero, overwriting every image that is not _exactly_ the
same.
Most comparisons has a threshold because different GPUs render slightly
differently. However, setting that threshold accurately can be hard.
Sometimes a test will pass locally, but fail on CI. In those cases you
want to force an update of the failing test. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
And sometimes a small change _should_ update all images, but the change
is so tiny that it falls under the threshold. Still, you want to make a
point of showing that these images have changes. You can use
`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=force` for that.
The override_text_color is now used when rendering text from a String or
&str. This is consistent with the RichText variant and makes the option
behave as advertised, taking precedence over WidgetVisuals and
overriding the color for all text unless explicitly changed for a single
widget (via RichText or LayoutJob).
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/7367>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
I thought about this - so we have two options here:
1. adding it to `SnapshotOptions`
2. adding it to every function which I do not like as this would be a
huge breaking change
## Summary
This pull request introduces a new feature to the `SnapshotOptions`
struct in the `egui_kittest` crate, allowing users to specify a
permissible percentage of pixel differences (`diff_percentage`) before a
snapshot comparison is considered a failure. This feature provides more
flexibility in handling minor visual discrepancies during snapshot
testing.
### Additions to `SnapshotOptions`:
* Added a new field `diff_percentage` of type `Option<f64>` to the
`SnapshotOptions` struct. This field allows users to define a tolerance
for pixel differences, with a default value of `None` (interpreted as 0%
tolerance).
* Updated the `Default` implementation of `SnapshotOptions` to
initialize `diff_percentage` to `None`.
### Integration into snapshot comparison logic:
* Updated the `try_image_snapshot_options` function to handle the new
`diff_percentage` field. If a `diff_percentage` is specified, the
function calculates the percentage of differing pixels and allows the
snapshot to pass if the difference is within the specified tolerance.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-6f481b5866b82a4fe126b7df2e6c9669040c79d1d200d76b87f376de5dec5065R204)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-6f481b5866b82a4fe126b7df2e6c9669040c79d1d200d76b87f376de5dec5065R294-R301)
* Closes <https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5683>
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
---------
Co-authored-by: lucasmerlin <hi@lucasmerlin.me>
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
I need to scroll in a snapshot test in my app, and kittest had no
utilities for this. Event::MouseWheel is error prone. This adds support
for some accesskit scroll actions, and uses this in kittest to add
helpers to scroll to a node / scroll the scroll area surrounding a node.
The accesskit code says down/up/left/right `Scrolls by approximately one
screen in a specific direction.`. Unfortunately it's difficult to get
the size of a "screen" (I guess that would be the size of the containing
scroll area)where I implemented the scrolling, so for now I've hardcoded
it to 100px. I think scrolling a fixed amount is still better than not
scrolling at all.
---------
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <emil.ernerfeldt@gmail.com>
This adds a custom Node struct with proper support for egui types
(`Key`, `Modifiers`, `egui::Event`, `Rect`) instead of needing to use
the kittest / accesskit types.
I also changed the `click` function to do a proper mouse move / mouse
down instead of the accesskit click. Also added `accesskit_click` to
trigger the accesskit event. This resulted in some changed snapshots,
since the elements are now hovered.
Also renamed `press_key` to `key_press` for consistency with
`key_down/key_up`.
Also removed the Deref to the AccessKit Node, to make it clearer when to
expect egui and when to expect accesskit types.
* Closes#5705
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
Today each widget does its own custom layout, which has some drawbacks:
- not very flexible
- you can add an `Image` to `Button` but it will always be shown on the
left side
- you can't add a `Image` to a e.g. a `SelectableLabel`
- a lot of duplicated code
This PR introduces `Atoms` and `AtomLayout` which abstracts over "widget
content" and layout within widgets, so it'd be possible to add images /
text / custom rendering (for e.g. the checkbox) to any widget.
A simple custom button implementation is now as easy as this:
```rs
pub struct ALButton<'a> {
al: AtomicLayout<'a>,
}
impl<'a> ALButton<'a> {
pub fn new(content: impl IntoAtomics) -> Self {
Self { al: content.into_atomics() }
}
}
impl<'a> Widget for ALButton<'a> {
fn ui(mut self, ui: &mut Ui) -> Response {
let response = ui.ctx().read_response(ui.next_auto_id());
let visuals = response.map_or(&ui.style().visuals.widgets.inactive, |response| {
ui.style().interact(&response)
});
self.al.frame = self
.al
.frame
.inner_margin(ui.style().spacing.button_padding)
.fill(visuals.bg_fill)
.stroke(visuals.bg_stroke)
.corner_radius(visuals.corner_radius);
self.al.show(ui)
}
}
```
The initial implementation only does very basic layout, just enough to
be able to implement most current egui widgets, so:
- only horizontal layout
- everything is centered
- a single item may grow/shrink based on the available space
- everything can be contained in a Frame
There is a trait `IntoAtoms` that conveniently allows you to construct
`Atoms` from a tuple
```
ui.button((Image::new("image.png"), "Click me!"))
```
to get a button with image and text.
This PR reimplements three egui widgets based on the new AtomLayout:
- Button
- matches the old button pixel-by-pixel
- Button with image is now [properly
aligned](https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/5830/files#diff-962ce2c68ab50724b01c6b64c683c4067edd9b79fcdcb39a6071021e33ebe772)
in justified layouts
- selected button style now matches SelecatbleLabel look
- For some reason the DragValue text seems shifted by a pixel almost
everywhere, but I think it's more centered now, yay?
- Checkbox
- basically pixel-perfect but apparently the check mesh is very slightly
different so I had to update the snapshot
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
- RadioButton
- pixel-perfect
- somehow needs a bit more space in some snapshot tests?
I plan on updating TextEdit based on AtomLayout in a separate PR (so
you could use it to add a icon within the textedit frame).
With kittest it was difficult to wait for images to be loaded before
taking a snapshot test.
This PR adds `Harness::with_wait_for_pending_images` (true by default)
which will cause `Harness::run` to sleep until all images are loaded (or
`HarnessBuilder::with_max_steps` is exceeded).
It also adds a new ImageLoader::has_pending and
BytesLoader::has_pending, which should be implemented if things are
loaded / decoded asynchronously.
It reverts https://github.com/emilk/egui/pull/6901 which was my previous
attempt to fix this (but this didn't work since only the tested crate is
compiled with cfg(test) and not it's dependencies)
<!--
Please read the "Making a PR" section of
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/emilk/egui/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
before opening a Pull Request!
* Keep your PR:s small and focused.
* The PR title is what ends up in the changelog, so make it descriptive!
* If applicable, add a screenshot or gif.
* If it is a non-trivial addition, consider adding a demo for it to
`egui_demo_lib`, or a new example.
* Do NOT open PR:s from your `master` branch, as that makes it hard for
maintainers to test and add commits to your PR.
* Remember to run `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy`.
* Open the PR as a draft until you have self-reviewed it and run
`./scripts/check.sh`.
* When you have addressed a PR comment, mark it as resolved.
Please be patient! I will review your PR, but my time is limited!
-->
* Closes https://github.com/emilk/egui/issues/5507
* [x] I have followed the instructions in the PR template
lucasmerlin
Emil Ernerfeldt
Ian Hobson
Andreas Reich
Gijs de Jong
Kumpelinus
Nicolas
valadaptive
YgorSouza
Lukas Rieger
TÖRÖK Attila
Lucas Meurer
Trương Hoàng Long